The Child Labor Bulletin on Federal Aid to Education, May 1918

This publication begins with a stunning declaration: “The people are no longer content to have our federal Government confine its activities within the bounds of what are generally understood to be purely national affairs.”

Edward N. Clopper, who made that declaration, was the assistant secretary of the National Child Labor Committee of New York (NCLC), an activist group. Thus, Clopper’s statement is a classical rhetorical switcheroo: an elite attributes his preferred position to the multitude, then assserts that he is simply giving voice to them.

There is no evidence that Americans in 1918 craved federal intervention in schooling, despite the enactment of the Smith-Hughes Act (high school vocational education act) the previous year. Federal policymaking was mostly confined to federal objectives se out in the U.S. Constitution, such as defense, trade, and mail delivery.

What is undeniable is that Clopper and the NCLC were in the progressive vanguard. They, along with groups such as the Committee on National Aid to Education (which John Dewey led), were pushing for Congress to fund aid to elementary education. And in this bulletin, the NCLC includeddraft legislation to cretae a U.S. Department of Education.

That effort for K-12 federal aid made little progress until the 1930s, albeit the measures were temporary and expired before the conclusion of the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Congress did not enact lasting elementary school aid until the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act. And the effort to create a cabinet-level education agency would not bear fruit until 1979.

The University of Pennsylvania’s library’s website has links to online copies of The Child Labor Bulletin, and its successor publication, The American Child.

40 Years After a Nation at Risk

April 2023 marks the 40th anniversary of the release of the report, A Nation at Risk. It was a big deal, as I have written here, and by declaring a antional education emergency stoked increased federal involvement in schools. This ws ironic, seeing as Reagan campaigned to “dismantle” the Department of Education, which had been created by congressional Democrats and President Jimmy Carter just a couple years earlier.

Five years ago, The74.com released this video, which includes interviews with folks who helped write the report.

And, for good measure, here’s a video released by the Fordham Foundation 10 years ago (30 years after the publication of A Nation at Risk).

Bureau of Education, Circulars of Information, 1883

Long ago, there exited the National Educational Association—which was a different organization than the present day National Education Association.

The National Educational Association was not a teachers’ union; rather it was a professional organization—one very different from the political powerhouse of today. In the late 19th century, this NEA and the nascent U.S. Bureau of Education collaborated.

This document is one such example: it is a collection of papers and presentations delivered by a gathering of “the Department of Superintendence of the National Educational Asociation.”

You can see from the list of attendees that these were mostly administrators. The topics covered range widely, and include the “constitutionality of national aid to education.” That the federal government should publish papers given by a private organization is a reminder of the eternal, and interesting public-private activities in federal gvoernance.

Full catalog citation: American Association of School Administrators, Proceedings of the Department of Duperintendence of the National Educational Association at its Meet at Washington, February 20-22, 1883 (Government Printing Office, 1883).

Short Memorandum on the Formation of the House Committee on Education and Labor (1975)

Draft Memo for Congress on Organizational Options for a Federal Educational Research Agency (1985-1990)

When Congress is pondering policy, it often turns to experts. This is a draft memorandum written sometime between 1985 and 1990. It aims to help Congress think through how it might best conduct educational research. Of particular value is the memorandum’s public administration perspective, which ponders the ways the agency might be structured to improve its odds of being effective.